MDWFP Logo

Wildlife & Hunting

Environmental and Genetic Effects on Deer

Antler Production in Mississippi

 

Principal Investigators

Dr. Steve Demarais
Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

Dr. Bronson Strickland
Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

Chad Dacus
Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks

 

Graduate Research Assistants

Emily Clemons
Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

Jeremy Flinn
Mississippi State University Department of Wildlife and Fisheries

 

Deer management with an emphasis on antler production has reached an intensity never before seen in North America.   Managers expect to improve antler production by manipulating population structure to increase the prevalence of older-aged, genetically-superior males.  However, deer need adequate nutrition to express their genetic potential for antler development.  The rate of growth and the expression of body and antler size varies across Mississippi.

Concern that some deer populations in Mississippi lack the genetic potential for superior antler development is complicated by the fact that expression of genetic potential can be limited by low-quality nutrition.  However, if genetic quality is limiting in some areas, then success of management programs designed to improve antler production would be limited.  We need to quantify the causes of regional variation in body and antler size in Mississippi to improve deer management effectiveness.  Production and growth of animals under equivalent environmental conditions is required to quantify the relative effects of genetics and nutrition on antler development variation.

This project will document the relative impact of nutrition on body and antler size variation among the three soil resource regions.  If similar nutritional intake eliminates the observed physical differences among regions then we would conclude that regional variation is due primarily to nutrition-based habitat variation.  If similar nutrition over two generations does not equalize body and antler size among regions, then we would conclude that genetic potential may limit physical development in some areas.  Additionally, this project will identify benchmark values for potential improvement of body and antler size within regions when nutrition is optimum.

Full Report on Research Accomplishments To Date.

Deer Antler Effects 1
Biologist Jerry Hazlewood sights in a tranquilizer rifle used to capture deer for this research project.

 

Deer Antler Effects 2
Once deer are captured from study areas, they are weighed...

 

Deer Antler Effects 3
... uniquely marked with ear tags...

 

Deer Antler Effects 4
... and transported to the Mississippi State University Deer Unit.

 

Deer Antler Effects 5
Dr. Steve Demarais releases a captured doe in the MSU Deer Unit.

 

Deer Antler Effects 6
Does from each soil region are fed the same nutritional ration, so all fawns are raised on optimal nutrition.

 

Deer Antler Effects 7
Fawns are also marked with unique ear tags.  By raising fawns from each soil region on optimal nutrition, buck fawns will be able to grow their antlers to their genetic potential.

 

Deer Antler Effects 8
We will monitor buck antler growth for many years to determine how the quality of their nutritional intake impacts their body and antler size. 

 

 

Funding for this project was provided by:

MDWFP logo MSU logo
FWRC logo Wildlife Restoration logo

 

Share this share this share this

Sign up, Keep Up

Sign up to receive monthly newsletters featuring all the latest news and happenings from MDWFP.
- or -
Sign up to receive survey questions from MDWFP. Your information is valuable to our conservation efforts!


Enroll